Thought provoking. Controversial. Presidential Puppetry is sure to raise lots of eye-brows. One of those books that inspires readers to look deep beneath the surface.

John Perkins, New York Times best-selling author of "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" and other books

Famed Conservative Federal Judge Accused of Posing Nude As Young Man

An Alabama legal reform advocate last week claimed that a nude photo published in 1997 by a popular gay pornography site depicted a future federal judge famed for his conservative views.

In a dispute that raises broader issues in the justice system, Roger Shuler, founder of the website Legal Schnauzer, alleges that a photo on in 1997 depicted future U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge William H. Pryor, Jr. The photo depicted a young man stark naked and in a state of sexual arousal.

William PryorThe judge, who has sharply criticized gays in the past, attacked Shuler for publishing it.

Shuler,stands by the identification, and seeks to review Pryor’s records to learn if he disclosed his past honestly during his Senate confirmation a decade ago.

A long-running battle over Pryor’s appointment to a lifetime seat was one of the most controversial nominations of the two-term presidency of George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009. Democrats initially blocked Pryor’s appointment in 2003 after complaints by African-Americans. Bush then made a temporary recess appointment to avoid continued Senate filibuster. The Senate later confirmed Pryor, a Republican, by an unusually close 53-45 vote in 2005.

Those controversies occurred before Pryor’s role became notorious with exposes beginning in 2007 alleging the frame-up of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, Alabama’s leading Democrat.

As state attorney general on a hard-right platform, Pryor began investigating Siegelman promptly after the governor took office in 1999. That probe morphed into a joint state-federal investigation after the Bush administration took office in 2001.

In a second trial in 2006, a jury convicted Siegelman on corruption charges largely stemming from his 1999 request to Richard Scrushy to contribute to the non-profit Alabama Education Foundation, which advocated a state lottery. Siegelman reappointed Scrushy to a state board on which Scrushy had served under three previous Republican governors.

But no evidence surfaced of a direct quid pro quo, as the law requires, except from the vague statements of a former Siegelman aide facing up to 10 years in prison on another matter. Prosecutors viciously intimidated the slender-built, effeminate-acting aide, Nick Bailey, in up to 70 coaching sessions with threats of a long sentence (during which he would presumably be raped by fellow inmates) unless he provided precisely the kinds of statements sought by prosecutors.

A dumbfounded Scrushy, a wealthy Republican, was imprisoned on a seven-year term, and now protests that he and Siegelman were framed for political reasons. During Scrushy’s imprisonment well-connected attorneys won a $500 million fraud judgment against Scrushy that, along with his legal fees and fines, destroyed his wealth from founding HealthSouth, Inc.

Thus, the Siegelman case is intimately involved with the controversy over the badpuppy photo — as is the transformation of Alabama politics from a two-party system with Democratic dominance as recently as the 1990s to essentially one-party GOP governance currently.


Comments are closed.